Joel Osteen’s Hurricane Harvey Reaction Tops This Week’s News Roundup

Over the past week or so, the world has seen devastation in both Texas and Mumbai, bringing out the best—and, as you’ll see below, the worst—in people in response. That doesn’t mean that the internet has been entirely focused on important things, however. Social media did spend quite a bit of time rehashing The Office and appreciating the new evil Star Wars droid this last week, too. Wait. What we talking about? Oh, yeah—the highlights and lowlights of what everyone else was talking about over the past seven days. Which is to say, this.

Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better

What Happened: Supporters of Presidents Trump and Obama got into a long spat over which White House occupant handled hurricane response more effectively. No one really won.

What Really Happened: The reality of political What-About-ism means that with President Trump facing criticism for his response to Hurricane Harvey—including promoting his own merchandise during appearances—it was only a matter of time before his supporters decided to point out, that, hey, President Obama might’ve been worse. And so it went.

To be fair, it’s not as if people weren’t expecting this particular line of attack—

—or, for that matter, prepared to make fun of it.

Yes, despite the fact that President Obama wasn’t actually President Obama when Hurricane Katrina hit—he wouldn’t be elected for another three years—the subject became enough of a right-wing talking point that Snopes actually had to publish a fact-check on the topic. And the mistake itself became a widely shared meme. Meanwhile, where was Obama during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina?

The Takeaway: This just in from the “You can’t please some people, no matter what you do” department…

If You Hang Around, You’re Going to Get Wet

What Happened: Who could have known that at the eye of the storm of Hurricane Harvey, it was all about CNN? That’s certainly a theory the internet was trying to argue this week.

What Really Happened: While we’re on the subject of Hurricane Harvey and the partisan reactions to it, let’s spare a moment to think about how the internet treated CNN during this whole thing. There were two particular moments during the week from the news network that made the rounds on social media, each for very different reasons. Firstly, there was the interview gone wrong:

Widely shared, the clip made CNN look bad (and was eagerly used by those waging war on the network as a result), but it turned out there was something around the corner that would show the cable news outfit in a far better light…

No, really.

This proved to be as viral as the earlier clip, because, you know, someone’s life was saved right there on television.

And, sure enough, this clip got shared a bunch too. However, as if to prove that no good deed goes unsuspected, there are reporter truthers out there already.

But was there some way the Harvey tragedy could become about CNN a third time in one week? Apparently so.

The irony being, of course, that by the time Eric Trump had tweeted this, CNN had already reported the story—look at this tweet from three hours earlier—leading to this snarky response from CNN PR’s official Twitter account:

The Takeaway: So, how were the other networks faring while CNN was getting all this attention? Well…

What Would Joel Osteen Do?

What Happened: Turns out, some self-identified Christians are a little uncertain about what Jesus would do in certain situations.

What Really Happened: Maybe you’re familiar with Joel Osteen by now. He’s the pastor of a so-called “megachurch” who didn’t immediately open his church to Harvey victims last week, a decision that prompted… well, exactly the kind of response you’d expect from Twitter.

Although Osteen would later open the church and claim the doors were never really closed, it was too late: his memetic shaming had itself gone viral.

The Takeaway: Well, if nothing else, there’s the newfound fame Osteen has as a result of this whole episode.

Bill of Rights

What Happened: US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin indicated in an interview that putting abolitionist Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill wasn’t a priority. Twitter then indicated that that wasn’t acceptable.

What Really Happened: Meanwhile, there were other things happening outside the flood-impacted areas of the internet last week. For one thing, remember the excitement over the possibility of Harriet Tubman getting placed on the $20 bill after she won an unofficial poll to get nominated? Well, get ready to get unexcited, because, guess what?

Yes, in an interview with CNBC, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said that the previous announcement about Tubman replacing Andrew Jackson was “not something I’m focused on at the moment,” which comes after President Trump said he’d rather keep Jackson. That… didn’t really go over well with a lot of people.

As Mnuchin’s comments drew a lot of attention from the media, West Wing and Scandal star Joshua Malina had a potential temporary solution.

People, it seemed, approved.

Meanwhile, on Hot Take Island…

The Takeaway: Actually, maybe there’s another option.

Sign o’ the Times

What Happened: Opinions! They’re just like elbows, amirite? Weird, lumpy, and probably not all deserving of wider attention in the pages—print or virtual—of esteemed national institutions.

What Really Happened: Ah, the opinion pages. Where the reputation of a newspaper goes to die, and the high standards of objective reporting get overwritten in the public’s mind by pieces penned with the objective of being outspoken, partisan, and, more often than not, highly controversial. Case in point:

Oh, New York Times, what are you doing? Actually, no need to ask, Twitter is here to explain.

If there was one upside from this public display of scorn and disapproval, it’s seeing Twitter come up with its own bad ideas for Times op-eds.

The Takeaway: Still, it’s not like it could be worse, right?

Really, by this point, we should know better than to ask.

‘Observer’ Review: The Mind-Bending Sci-Fi Game Made Me Doubt Reality

I press a buzzer on a dingy apartment door, and a single pulsing eye appears on the intercom screen. My voice comes out frail, disappointed, all age and regret. “KPD,” says the visitor, meaning Krakow Police Department. “I need to talk to you for a moment.” The voice that responds is incoherent, rambling, paranoid. I find myself wondering if it’s even real.

That’s not the kind of question I often ask myself in videogames, but Observer is something special. The first-person experience by Polish studio Bloober Team features one of the most convincing realities I’ve seen in some time—and the devs build it for the express purpose of breaking it apart. Normally, I happily let games go where they want to without stressing over the integrity of the world they inhabit. After all, it’s not real; the difference between hallucination and objectivity isn’t an essential one. But Observer, a cyberpunk meditation on the frailty of perception and the tenuous bonds that tie people together, made me question my own eyes.

  • More From the Author

  • Julie Muncy

    Sonic Mania Makes Sonic Super Again By Trusting the Hits (and the Fans)

  • Julie Muncy

    One Year Later, No Man’s Sky—and Its Evolution—Is Worth Exploring

  • Julie Muncy

    This Game Isn’t Just Metal—It’s a Horror Treasure

In the game, you play a titular “observer,” a type of futuristic detective who gathers information by plugging into the neural implants of victims. You begin in a patrol car, receiving an unexpected, abrupt phone call from your son. The game moves to an apartment complex in the slums. The complex goes on lockdown for unknown reasons not long after you arrive, trapping you inside with all the tenants. What follows feels like Die Hard if it had been written by Philip K. Dick and directed by David Cronenberg, where the only way to escape is to solve an existential mystery about the nature of reality.

What’s really important here isn’t the plot, but the presentation. As you jack into the implants of the dead or dying to determine what’s going on and where your son might be, reality gets fuzzy. The world is already unstable, dotted with holographic augmented-reality displays that warp space with a mixture of advertisements and propaganda—but once you jack in, everything changes.

The memories of a dying person aren’t pleasant. In harrowing segments full of fragmented hallucinations and broken spaces, Observer pulls you through entire life stories as they flash through collapsing minds. I found myself inside a prison cell with a convict enduring withdrawal, only to jump to his apartment, where he lies dying. As I move through it, it loops and fractures, and I’m back in prison, walking down an endless hallway. In another memorable segment, I’m in a cubicle farm that slowly morphs from a metaphorical labyrinth into a literal one; piles of retro-style computers and servers jut from the walls, glistening as if alive.

After experiences like that, nothing quite feels real anymore. And when hallucinations from the mental world start seeping into the real one, the entire landscape of the game finds itself in unstable territory. Is any of this real? Whose hallucinations are these? Bloober Team sells these questions with a stunning devotion to space and presentation. They’re not new ideas, and the story Observer tells isn’t original, but space and time shift before your eyes in uncanny and unsettling ways. Technology and flesh blend in creepy ways. The apartment complex’s navigable corridors and rooms turn into genuinely impossible mental landscapes with a stunning, unsettling clarity.

Obsever sells the sense that you don’t know what’s coming next, and it invests its environments with such dense detail that I found myself genuinely invested in knowing what parts of my experiences could be mapped to an objective reality—if any. This is Observer‘s best trick: I wanted to understand this place even as it fell apart around me.

The game, on PC and Xbox, isn’t likely to reach a wide audience, and many who do play it might be turned off by its rough edges. It tosses unnecessary and tedious stealth segments into its cyberpunk haunted house for no compelling reason, and Rutger Hauer’s central vocal performance is awkward and wooden (though it does sell the sense of a deeply disengaged, alienated noir protagonist). Several of its individual pieces don’t work. But it flows beautifully as a whole.

Late in the game, you’re offered a choice. You can jack into the brain of one more victim, enter one more broken world, or you can move on. Hesitating might cause you to miss key information, but who knows what will happen if you forge ahead? Each psychic journey is a violation of objective reality, and one too many could break your observer. Could break everything.

The brilliance of Observer lies in this simple detail: I hesitated, because I was genuinely afraid of what might happen. Any game that accomplishes that is a game worth playing.

The Perfect Comic to Honor Jack Kirby’s 100th Birthday

This year marks what would have been comic book legend Jack Kirby‘s 100th birthday, a fact that last week’s Comic-Con International marked with no fewer than six panels dedicated to his work and countless others on the characters and concepts he created in his nearly 70-year career. It was a fitting tribute for the man who gave comic book fans everyone from the Avengers to the DC mega-villain Darkseid. Many of those marquee characters have not fared as well as others, but there is one comic coming this year that lives up to their legacy—even if it doesn’t feature any of them at all.

For fans who only know the “King of Comics” because of his work creating the Marvel Universe (Iron Man, Thor, Black Panther, the X-Men, and so on), DC’s revival of Mister Miracle might seem like an odd way to honor Kirby. But for those who followed his work beyond Marvel, the reboot of the Fourth World Saga title is, arguably, the one most true to Kirby’s contributions to the genre. Written by Tom King (Marvel’s The Vision and DC’s current Batman series) with art by Mitch Gerads (King’s collaborator on The Sheriff of Babylon), the new Mister Miracle manages to honor Kirby, who died in 1994, by not trying to be him.

Related Stories

  • Angela Watercutter

    Jack Kirby’s Art for the Fake Movie in Argo Goes Up for Auction

  • Brian Raftery

    Spider-Man: Homecoming Is as Light and Powerful as Spidey’s Web

  • Mark Yarm

    Ta-Nehisi Coates Fights the Power—Literally—With Black Panther

In the decades between when he co-created Captain America in the 1940s and what many consider his (unfinished) magnum opus Fourth World in the ’70s, Kirby’s storytelling style reinvented the superhero genre and gave the medium a visual language it still uses today. The new Mister Miracle, out August 9, doesn’t try to recreate his aesthetics, but rather pays homage to the influence they had, using digital techniques to mix together Kirby’s original work (the cover for Kirby’s first issue appears as a background detail in the new series), comic book iconography, and other pop culture visuals. The result is a comic that feels both fresh and familiar.

That’s not true for a lot of Kirby’s Marvel creations these days. The publisher’s current line is built almost exclusively around Kirby concepts, but its summer storyline, Secret Empire, turns Captain America into a fascist who has taken over the US. In the fall, Marvel Legacy will attempt to course-correct, but will do so with a line-up that drops Cap entirely while replacing Kirby’s takes on Thor and Iron Man with new versions. (It’s not all bad, though. Black Panther remains one of the publisher’s highest-profile series thanks to writer Ta-Nehisi Coates. And the current Marvel Studios movies are staying relatively true to the Kirby-established DNA.)

DC Entertainment

Over at DC, things are very different. Despite having a shorter history with Kirby, the publisher has launched two new series anchored by his creations so far this year, including Kamandi Challenge and Bug, the latter coming from the Young Animal imprint. Honoring Fourth World, though, is at the forefront. In addition to the Mister Miracle reboot, the publisher is also releasing six special one-off issues featuring Fourth World characters and other Kirby creations. Those releases might not have the pop of big Marvel movies, but for many Kirby fans, it’s the Fourth World titles that deserve the most recognition.

Comprising four series running alongside each other, all written and drawn by Kirby, Fourth World took the lessons Kirby had learned from his Marvel work and applied them to the real world. Comics like Mister Miracle and New Gods were as much about contemporaneous issues—the ’60s/’70s counterculture, Vietnam—and Kirby’s own experiences in WWII as they were about the fictional godlike beings that appeared in their pages. The line was a commercial flop, perhaps due to the fact that it was so ahead of its time, but Fourth World‘s forward-looking concepts now make it the perfect vehicle for showing off his legacy.

To that end, the first issue of Mister Miracle is wondrous and dizzying, yet never unclear (thanks, in large part, to the use of the nine-panel page structure Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons used for Watchmen). Its closest antecedent is probably the FX show Legion, but it feels very much like its own thing, building on what came before without disrespecting any of its predecessors—which is exactly the attitude Kirby himself reportedly had when taking over comics like The Losers or Superman’s Pal, Jimmy Olsen back in the day.

Beyond that, Mister Miracle succeeds where other comics featuring Kirby characters have failed by doing something that has, sadly, become an increasingly rare skill: telling a story about universal experiences and giving the audience characters to care about. And if there’s one lesson that the King of Comics would want to teach today’s comic creators, it’s likely that one. Jack Kirby would have turned 100 the same month Mister Miracle hits shelves. It is—if nothing else—a birthday present to the medium he loved so much.

Sure, But who is Gonna Pay to Colonize area?

Science fiction is filled with grand visions of mankind releasing colony ship fleets to settle alien globes. Pretty cool, appropriate? It is, but sci-fi writer James Patrick Kelly desires to know who would be investing in all those ambitious colonization missions.

“It’s a truism your field does not acknowledge that hardly any, if any, technology fiction authors have any idea of economics,” Kelly says in Episode 264 of the Geek’s Guide towards Galaxy podcast.

In Kelly’s new novel Mother Go, opposition up to a colony ship steadily mounts while the launch date approaches must be vocal ‘Earth First’ faction doesn’t want to see plenty technology and talent depart our planet forever. Kelly thinks that’s an all-too-plausible situation.

“Is that really exactly what Joe Six-Pack will wish to spend his money on, to make certain that some future, future, future, future generation will have a delighted life on some globe on offer Tau Ceti?” Kelly states.

Sci-fi frequently makes interstellar travel appearance easy, with figures jetting around the galaxy making use of FTL drives. But such technology will most likely never ever occur. Alternatively area travel could be sluggish, dangerous, and grueling. “The galactic cosmic radiation of being exposed in a starship, a well-shielded starship, is such that it most likely is often a problem,” Kelly claims. “You’re likely to be exposed to galactic cosmic radiation for decades, and that isn’t good for you.”

Offered all hurdles, he believes an interstellar voyage is not likely unless technology fundamentally changes the equation. As an example, if everyone was capable keep their flesh systems behind, that will make enough space travel a lot more practical.

“I type of have confidence in Charlie Stross‘ proven fact that the future of room exploration is we’ll download ourselves into Coke-can-sized spaceships,” claims Kelly.

Tune in to the complete meeting with James Patrick Kelly in Episode 264 of Geek’s Guide on Galaxy (above). And look for some highlights from discussion below.

James Patrick Kelly on hereditary engineering:

“We can say for certain that there are hibernators, extremely effective hibernators. There’s a little hand-wavey thing going on [in my work] where I’m positing that the same systems that allow a ground squirrel to hibernate are transferable and helpful for humans. The bottom squirrel trend along with other hibernation phenomena exist in true to life, and there is chemistry and biology which were studied about how precisely it really works, but there’s simply no way we understand just how to try this, to genetically modify humans. But alternatively, it is 150 years as time goes by, give me a rest. This really is inside the purview of technology fiction extrapolation, when it is proved incorrect I’ll be long dead—unless I’m hibernating as well as on my way to the stars, we don’t understand.”

James Patrick Kelly on Syfy, back in the heady days as soon as the internet appeared like the magical carpeting trip to success and millions of dollars and popularity, they’d a show called Seeing Ear Theater. Seeing Ear Theater had been audio plays written by technology fiction article writers, and because Sci-Fi was downtown, in ny, they might simply grab actors who had been on Broadway or moving through. … therefore Paul Giamatti did an account of my own. Not my own, but Brian Dennehy did them. Claire Bloom, John Turturro, all these individuals. … [But] it had beenn’t pulling its fat, so that it went away.”

James Patrick Kelly on teaching writing:

“This will probably sound like I’m maybe not tolerant, however if you’re an undergrad and also you wish to compose technology fiction and fantasy, you truly can’t have the types of feedback you would like unless you’re workshopping with a person who is in fact publishing science fiction. … you will need the sort of feedback that only somebody who understands the industry and who is publishing in the field will give you. As well as the unfortunate fact of the matter is a lot of people that show writing are lightly published, if published at all. They’re not working authors, they’re training writers. This is usually a problem with writing programs—how qualified could be the writing teacher to show you about the types of writing you want to do?”

Get back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article.

‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ Recap, Episode 10: Dystopia Ain’t great at Happy Endings

In a dystopia, there are not any happy endings. Despite exactly what June claims or thinks, life won’t ever go back to how it had been. Moira can’t erase the evenings of ritual rape. Janine can’t restore a person’s eye the Republic of Gilead took from the woman. June can’t be here on her daughter’s childhood.

But providing there’s opposition, there’s hope. If the handmaids first arrived towards Rachel and Leah Center for training, they shared a look of terror to them, a appearance June (Elisabeth Moss) had never seen in actual life. But by The Handmaid’s Tale season finale, June, armed by having a package the Mayday Resistance, is currently longer afraid. “They should not have provided united states uniforms if they didn’t desire us become an military,” she believes, striding down snowy Boston roads with her fellow red-dressed soldiers.

Related Tales

  • Charley Locke

    Handmaid’s Tale: Either You Break the principles, or They Break You

  • Charley Locke

    Handmaid’s Tale: Oops, we developed a Sexist Tyranny and Now i need to are now living in It

  • Charley Locke

    Handmaid’s Tale: Be Sure You Escape the Dystopia Before It’s Too Late

Gilead’s leaders, though, won’t drop without a fight—an unsightly one. After June hides the secret package behind a tub at her Commander’s house, their spouse Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski) strikes the lady across the face, knocking June towards the floor. “I trusted you,” she states. “You might have kept me with one thing.” Mrs. Waterford has discovered June’s illicit brothel trips along with her spouse, betraying the strict roles associated with the republic. After bloodying the woman face, Serena Joy hands the lady a maternity test: She must know that the nights aided by the Commander, the affair between June and Nick she helped orchestrate, have at least resulted in an infant. For Serena Joy—and the regime—that’s the entire point of June’s existence.

Also it’s worked: June is expecting. Instantly, things change. Serena Joy does not damage the lady. Rita hugs the lady and prepares her a particular breakfast. When June tells Nick (Max Minghella), the presumed dad, we come across a uncommon minute of intimacy, as he touches the woman belly, holds her hand, and leans into her neck. Rape and misogyny didn’t prompt him to combat the regime, but personal stakes—the possibility for his or her own child—do. They could be a family. They might escape.

Serena Joy senses their private hope, and contains a plan to squash it. She escorts June as a car, locks the doors behind the girl, and takes the girl up to a nearby home. June is left in car while Serena Joy walks up and sits on steps of the property having young girl wearing pink: June’s daughter, Hannah. June pleads aided by the motorist to be discrete, pounds on the screen, throws herself against the vehicle home, to no avail. “As long as my infant is safe, therefore is yours,” Serena Joy informs her, making certain June, the vessel carrying the baby she wants, stays compliant. Serena Joy may feel June has rendered her powerless in her wedding, but she constantly discovers ways to remind her handmaid that is responsible. “You are deranged, you’re fucking wicked, you know that?” says June, spitting the language on Commander’s spouse through the window. “You are a goddamn motherfucking monster.” A monster who can utilize Hannah’s life as security. June asks the Commander to guard her daughter, but are no guarantees. She’s caught.

Rape and misogyny didn’t prompt Nick to combat the regime, but individual stakes—the chance for his own child—do.

But Moira (Samira Wiley) isn’t. She finally managed to make it out of Gilead after taking a man’s clothing at shiv-point and driving faraway from the brothel Jezebel’s. She makes it to Ontario and it is brought to a federal government center, where we finally see the mundane bureaucracy of survivors. A person provides Moira a refugee ID card, a prepaid mobile phone, a bag of clothes, a health care insurance card. (Oh, Canada.) Then, she’s free to do as she wants: to read, to shower, to get food. The caseworker tells a dumbfounded Moira, “it’s totally up to you.” Entirely alone and unmoored, she wanders out of the office discover Luke (O-T Fagbenle), the lady best friend’s spouse, awaiting her. “You’re on my list,” says Luke. It cann’t make a difference when they fought a lifetime ago—they’re family.

After Serena Joy confronts him about their event with June, the Commander tries to make amends. Soon, Offred/June will likely to be gone, and also the three of them—Serena, Fred, and the baby—will have the ability to take up a brand new family members. When the handmaid has served the woman purpose, she’ll disappear completely from their lives.

Except stealing someone’s infant isn’t quite very easy. After he made promises to his handmaid Janine they could run away together, Commander Putnam (Stephen Kunken) can’t leave his sin before. He faces a tribunal of peers, and thanks to their wife’s plea he get the harshest possible punishment, he loses a hand for his affair. The spouses still hold some energy, even if it is only vindictive.

June is headed for either punishment or escape; either way, she’s making.

But Janine (Madeline Brewer), the transgressive handmaid, suffers a worse fate: As soon as the other handmaids are summoned up to a Salvaging, it’s no not known guy they’re told to stone to death, but among their. For once, we come across the internal struggle of Aunt Lydia (Ann Dowd), the girl who trained and subjugated these women. “My unique girls,” she claims, searching across a sea of red dresses and white bonnets. “So stunning.” However the punishment for endangering a young child is death by stoning, and so one of her special girls must perish. She blows the whistle.

But the handmaids rally and refuse to murder Janine. Ofglen (Tattiawna Jones), the most stalwart believer in Gilead, shouts out this is insane, and gets hit because of the muzzle of a weapon. The remainder handmaids stay alone, holding their stones. June appears up, drops her rock, and states, “I’m sorry, Aunt Lydia.” Others handmaids follow suit. It’s an work of rebellion, couched in submissive apology. Aunt Lydia is confused, upset, irate. “There will soon be consequences, believe me,” she informs the handmaids. But also for now, they’ve spared the life span of one of these own.

As June sits by her screen, awaiting punishment for sparing living of the woman buddy, she seems relaxed. “I should really be terrified, but personally i think serene,” she thinks. “There’s a kind of hope, it seems, even in futility.” A black colored automobile brings up, and prior to the Eyes come to take the woman away, Nick tells the girl, “just go, trust in me.” Surprising no body, he finally views the worth in bucking the machine whenever his own youngster is involved. June walks past the bewildered Waterfords and in to the automobile. “And therefore I step up, to the darkness within—or else the light,” she believes. She’s headed for either punishment or escape; in either case, she’s making.

Margaret Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale novel ends Offred’s story here. In an additional chapter, a teacher of Gileadean Studies dissects her journal for facts, but cannot find documents regarding the rest of the woman life. The very first period expanded somewhat through the guide, through tales of Moira, Janine, and Luke, and Season 2 is going to do equivalent. “The world has escaped from guide, and has now taken on a new way life of its own,” claims writer Atwood, who’ll continue steadily to work closely with show creator Bruce Miller in the second season. The Handmaid’s Tale escaped Atwood’s imagination as a result of Hulu—as for June’s escape, fans will need to keep viewing to discover.