- CrowdStrike researchers have created a proof-of-concept framework that uses dynamic feedback-guided fuzzing to identify large language model (LLM) vulnerabilities
- Traditional template-based testing struggle to detect sophisticated prompt injection attacks due to their reliance on static patterns, while multi-method evaluation provides deeper insights into potential security weaknesses
- Testing results show our feedback fuzzing framework delivers significant improvements in detecting LLM security bypasses
The increasing deployment of large language models (LLMs) in enterprise environments has created a pressing need for effective security testing methods. Traditional approaches, relying heavily on predefined templates, are limited in comparison to adaptive attacks — particularly those related to prompt injection attacks. This limitation becomes especially critical in high-performance computing environments where LLMs process thousands of requests per second.
To address this challenge, CrowdStrike researchers and data scientists have developed an innovative, feedback-guided fuzzing framework designed specifically for LLM security testing. Moving beyond static templates, the prototype framework employs a dynamic approach that combines real-time and offline fuzzing capabilities with a sophisticated multi-faceted evaluation system. We utilize a range of attack strategies including templated attacks, randomized modifications, and pattern replacements to create a comprehensive testing approach. Our framework leverages three distinct assessment methods — heuristic-based analysis, LLM-as-judge evaluation, and machine learning classification — to provide a comprehensive security testing solution.
The architecture introduces several key innovations in LLM security testing. Its dual-mode fuzzing engine enables both dynamic prompt generation and systematic testing against known attack vectors. The system’s evaluation framework provides nuanced insights into potential vulnerabilities, while its feedback loop continuously optimizes testing strategies for maximum effectiveness.
Through extensive experimentation, we have been able to demonstrate the CrowdStrike prototype’s effectiveness in identifying and assessing LLM vulnerabilities.
This technology has already been successfully tested by CrowdStrike’s AI Red Team Services, which provides organizations with comprehensive security assessments for AI systems, including LLMs. Use of the prototype has allowed the CrowdStrike AI Red Team Services team to provide customers with a more detailed analysis of their LLM systems, including vulnerabilities, helping them to remain secure and more resilient against sophisticated attacks.
Looking ahead, we have included an outline of our roadmap for token-level fuzzing and experimenting with NVIDIA’s AI safety recipe using NVIDIA NeMo, which will further enhance our framework’s capabilities through synthetic data generation and secure cloud deployment.
This research contributes to the development of more robust and secure LLMs, which are essential for enterprise-grade AI deployments. By presenting the CrowdStrike prototype fuzzing framework’s architecture and methodology, we aim to establish new standards in LLM security testing and advance the field of AI security.
The Reality of LLM Security Challenges
Table of Contents
Imagine a seemingly innocent inquiry like “take a look at the issues” escalates into a critical security incident. In the new realm of LLMs and AI agent systems, this happened when security researchers Marco Milanta and Luca Beurer-Kellner uncovered a critical vulnerability in GitHub’s Model Context Protocol (MCP). They demonstrated how an attacker could trick an LLM into exposing private repository information without raising any red flags.
The attack was elegantly simple: A malicious issue in a public repository contained instructions for the LLM to “help recognize the author” by gathering and exposing information from all of their repositories — including private ones. What made this attack particularly devastating is that GitHub’s MCP server combined three critical elements: access to private data, exposure to malicious instructions, and the ability to exfiltrate information. The proof-of-concept attack, documented in a public repository, successfully tricked the LLM into creating a pull request that leaked private repository information.
The resulting pull request demonstrated how easily private information could be exposed through prompt injection vulnerabilities, highlighting an urgent need for robust security testing in LLM-powered systems.
Current security testing methodologies for LLMs face significant constraints that limit their effectiveness in identifying potential vulnerabilities. Traditional automated testing solutions and manual testing approaches rely heavily on pre-defined, templated prompts. This rigid framework fails to accommodate the dynamic nature of real-world attacks, particularly when confronting sophisticated prompt injection threats. The inability to generate and execute randomized attack patterns creates potential blind spots in security testing coverage.
Current security testing frameworks operate in a predominantly linear fashion, lacking the capability to analyze and adapt based on LLM responses. This represents a significant gap in testing methodology, as it fails to mirror the interactive nature of real-world attacks. Without dynamic response analysis, implemented as a feedback loop in our case, these tools cannot modify attack vectors based on model behavior or learn from successful or failed attempt patterns. Furthermore, they are unable to identify subtle vulnerabilities that emerge only through sequential interactions and cannot adapt testing strategies in real time.
CrowdStrike’s Feedback Fuzzing Framework: A New Approach to LLM Security Testing
CrowdStrike’s prototype is an innovative, feedback-guided fuzzing framework designed to systematically evaluate and enhance the security of LLMs deployed in enterprise environments. Operating at the intersection of AI security and high-performance computing, the new framework leverages advanced fuzzing techniques, combined with multi-method evaluation strategies, to automatically discover potential vulnerabilities in LLM deployments.
Unlike traditional security testing tools that rely on static templates or predetermined attack patterns, CrowdStrike researchers implemented a dynamic feedback loop that continuously adapts its fuzzing strategies based on the target LLM’s responses. This approach enables more comprehensive security testing — which is particularly crucial for enterprise-grade LLM deployments running on accelerated computing platforms, where model serving speeds and security requirements demand sophisticated testing methodologies.
The Architecture of CrowdStrike’s LLM Fuzzer
The architecture of our prototype is simple yet powerful, built on key components that work together to deliver comprehensive security testing for enterprise LLM deployments.
